skip to primary navigationskip to content
 

03.11.17 X-chromosome reactivation in the inner cell mass happens at different stages for different genes

last modified Nov 13, 2017 09:47 AM
Borensztein et al. show in this Nature Communications paper that different genes on the paternal X-chromosome may be reactivated by transcription factors or active erasure of chromatin marks
03.11.17 X-chromosome reactivation in the inner cell mass happens at different stages for different genes

Fig. 2a (excerpt): Inner cell mass showing H3K27 tri-methylation (grey scale), Xist RNA (green) and primary transcription from an X-linked gene (red).

Contribution of epigenetic landscapes and transcription factors to X-chromosome reactivation in the inner cell mass

Borensztein M et al. (2017) Nat Commun. 8(1):1297. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01415-5.

 

Abstract

X-chromosome inactivation is established during early development. In mice, transcriptional repression of the paternal X-chromosome (Xp) and enrichment in epigenetic marks such as H3K27me3 is achieved by the early blastocyst stage. X-chromosome inactivation is then reversed in the inner cell mass. The mechanisms underlying Xp reactivation remain enigmatic.

Using in vivo single-cell approaches (allele-specific RNAseq, nascent RNA-fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence), we show here that different genes are reactivated at different stages, with more slowly reactivated genes tending to be enriched in H3meK27.

We further show that in UTX H3K27 histone demethylase mutant embryos, these genes are even more slowly reactivated, suggesting that these genes carry an epigenetic memory that may be actively lost. On the other hand, expression of rapidly reactivated genes may be driven by transcription factors.

Thus, some X-linked genes have minimal epigenetic memory in the inner cell mass, whereas others may require active erasure of chromatin marks.

 

Read more about research in the Surani lab.

Studying development to understand disease

The Gurdon Institute is funded by Wellcome and Cancer Research UK to study the biology of development, and how normal growth and maintenance go wrong in cancer and other diseases.

combinedLogo x3 trans2018

 

Share this

scmap: projection of single-cell RNA-seq data across data sets

Single-cell transcriptomics reveals a new dynamical function of transcription factors during embryonic hematopoiesis

Map of synthetic rescue interactions for the Fanconi anemia DNA repair pathway identifies USP48

The developmental origin of brain tumours: a cellular and molecular framework

Bioinformatics challenges and perspectives when studying the effect of epigenetic modifications on alternative splicing

ATM orchestrates the DNA-damage response to counter toxic non-homologous end-joining at broken replication forks

Extracellular Forms of Aβ and Tau from iPSC Models of Alzheimer's Disease Disrupt Synaptic Plasticity

Combinational Treatment of Trichostatin A and Vitamin C Improves the Efficiency of Cloning Mice by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer

Predominant Asymmetrical Stem Cell Fate Outcome Limits the Rate of Niche Succession in Human Colonic Crypts

G9a regulates temporal preimplantation developmental program and lineage segregation in blastocyst

Validating the concept of mutational signatures with isogenic cell models

A PAX5-OCT4-PRDM1 developmental switch specifies human primordial germ cells

Targeting NAT10 enhances healthspan and lifespan in a mouse model of human accelerated aging syndrome

An alternative mode of epithelial polarity in the Drosophila midgut

Detection of functional protein domains by unbiased genome-wide forward genetic screening

Fank1 and Jazf1 promote multiciliated cell differentiation in the mouse airway epithelium

Genome organization at different scales: nature, formation and function

Mouse Model of Alagille Syndrome and Mechanisms of Jagged1 Missense Mutations

 

Link to full list on PubMed