Sumru Bayin

Group leader

Research summary

Molecular mechanisms that regulate stem cell behaviours and age-dependent regenerative mechanisms in the brain

Our lab is interested in answering two overarching questions:
1. What are the cellular and molecular mechanisms that enable regeneration in the neonates and inhibit in the adult?
2. Can we facilitate regeneration in the brain?

Using neonatal cerebellum as a paradigm, our goal is to answer fundamental questions about neural stem cells and their behaviours using:
1. Genetically-engineered mouse models
2. Single cell genomics
3. In vivo injury models and in vitro stem cell assays

Expand summary

An understanding of the diversity of neural progenitors and flexibility in their fate choices – lineage plasticity – is crucial for understanding how complex organs like the brain are generated or undergo repair. The neonatal mouse cerebellum has emerged as a powerful model system to uncover regenerative responses and study progenitor plasticity due to its high regenerative potential.

The cerebellum is a folded hindbrain structure that is important for skilled motor movements and higher order cognitive functions. Its protracted development makes the neonatal cerebellum susceptible to injury around birth. Indeed, cerebellar injury and hypoplasia is the second leading risk factor for autism spectrum disorders. Therefore, it is critical to understand the regenerative potential of the neonatal cerebellum and identify factors that could enhance repair.

We have previously shown that the cerebellum can recover from the loss of at least two types of neurons via distinct regenerative mechanisms (Wojcinski, Nature Neuroscience, 2017; Bayin, eLife, 2018; Bayin, Science Advances, 2021). In one case, when the rhombic lip-derived granule cell progenitors are ablated, a subpopulation of the ventricular zone-derived nestin-expressing progenitors (NEPs) that normally generate Bergmann glia and astrocytes undergoes adaptive reprograming and replenishes some of the lost granule cell progenitors. However, the full repertoire of molecular and cellular mechanisms that regulate neonatal cerebellar development and adaptive reprograming of NEPs upon injury remain to be studied.

Interestingly, the regenerative potential of the neonatal cerebellum dramatically decreases once development ends, despite the presence of NEP-like cells in the adult mouse cerebellum. Furthermore, we found they are able to respond to different types of cerebellar injury by increasing their numbers, however neuron production is blocked and only some astrocytes for produced. We hypothesize that the lack of regeneration is due to a lack of pro-regenerative developmental signals in the adult brain in addition to epigenetic silencing of stem cell differentiation programs and inhibitory cellular mechanisms as development is completed.

Regenerating cerebellar cells identified by lineage tracing

Mighty NEPs to the rescue of the neonatal cerebellum: Lineage tracing identifies a subset of the nestin-expressing progenitors (NEPs: red) that are able to change their fate and replace the cells lost upon injury at birth. Molecular mechanisms that regulate the lineage decisions of NEPs during development and upon injury remain to be resolved.

Sumru Bayin colour portrait

Selected publications

  • Bayin NS et al. (2021) Injury induced ASCL1 expression orchestrates a transitory cell state required for repair of the neonatal cerebellum. Science Adv. 7(50). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abj1598.

    December 8, 2021

    Read more
  • Bayin NS et al. (2018) Age-dependent dormant resident progenitors are stimulated by injury to regenerate Purkinje neurons. eLife 7:e39879. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.39879.

    August 9, 2018

    Read more
  • Wojcinski A et al. (2017) Cerebellar Granule Cell Replenishment Post-Injury by Adaptive Reprogramming of Nestin+ Progenitors. Nature Neuroscience 20: 1361–1370. DOI:10.1038/nn.4621.

    August 14, 2017

    Read more
  • Bayin NS et al. (2017) Notch signaling regulates metabolic heterogeneity in glioblastoma stem cells. Oncotarget 8:64932-64953. DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.18117.

    May 23, 2017

    Read more
  • Bayin NS et al. (2016) GPR133 (ADGRD1), an adhesion G protein-coupled receptor, is necessary for glioblastoma growth. Oncogenesis 5, e263 DOI:10.1038/oncsis.2016.63.

    October 24, 2016

    Read more